XAL6060-223 | PartQuest™ Explore

Compare Soft Saturation vs. Regular Inductor - Switching

Mike Donnelly
Designer19

Mike Donnelly

Member for

10 years 5 months

1,541

designs

10

groups

Member of the PartQuest Explore Development Team. Focused on modeling and simulation of analog, mixed-signal and multi-discipline systems covering a broad range of applications, including power electronics, controls and mechatronic systems.

Description

This design shows the importance of choosing the right inductor size and type, to avoid saturation-induced current spikes during operating transients. In this case, the start-up transient in two nearly identical open-loop buck power stages (12V -&gt; 3V) is examined. The only difference is that the top circuit is using an inductor calibrated to a Coilcraft XAL6060-223 (22uH), which has "soft saturation" behavior. The bottom circuit is using a similarly sized inductor, but with a more typical "hard saturation" characteristic.

Both inductors work well for the steady-state load condition of 3 Amp. But during the turn-on transient, that current can go significantly above that nominal level. At that time, the instantaneous inductance of the hard-saturating device collapses, resulting in even larger current spikes in each switching interval. Note in the waveforms on the left: The soft-saturation inductance drops to 14uH minimum during the transient, whereas the hard-saturation inductance crashes to near 2uH, or only 10% of its nominal value!

About text formats

Copy of Compare Soft Saturation vs. Regular Inductor - Switching - on Tue, 03/19/2024 - 17:11

Designer0

Member for

4 years 3 months

0

designs

0

groups

Description

This design shows the importance of choosing the right inductor size and type, to avoid saturation-induced current spikes during operating transients. In this case, the start-up transient in two nearly identical open-loop buck power stages (12V -&gt; 3V) is examined. The only difference is that the top circuit is using an inductor calibrated to a Coilcraft XAL6060-223 (22uH), which has "soft saturation" behavior. The bottom circuit is using a similarly sized inductor, but with a more typical "hard saturation" characteristic.

Both inductors work well for the steady-state load condition of 3 Amp. But during the turn-on transient, that current can go significantly above that nominal level. At that time, the instantaneous inductance of the hard-saturating device collapses, resulting in even larger current spikes in each switching interval. Note in the waveforms on the left: The soft-saturation inductance drops to 14uH minimum during the transient, whereas the hard-saturation inductance crashes to near 2uH, or only 10% of its nominal value!

About text formats

Copy of Compare Soft Saturation vs. Regular Inductor - Switching - on Tue, 03/19/2024 - 17:11

Designer0

Member for

4 years 3 months

0

designs

0

groups

Description

This design shows the importance of choosing the right inductor size and type, to avoid saturation-induced current spikes during operating transients. In this case, the start-up transient in two nearly identical open-loop buck power stages (12V -&gt; 3V) is examined. The only difference is that the top circuit is using an inductor calibrated to a Coilcraft XAL6060-223 (22uH), which has "soft saturation" behavior. The bottom circuit is using a similarly sized inductor, but with a more typical "hard saturation" characteristic.

Both inductors work well for the steady-state load condition of 3 Amp. But during the turn-on transient, that current can go significantly above that nominal level. At that time, the instantaneous inductance of the hard-saturating device collapses, resulting in even larger current spikes in each switching interval. Note in the waveforms on the left: The soft-saturation inductance drops to 14uH minimum during the transient, whereas the hard-saturation inductance crashes to near 2uH, or only 10% of its nominal value!

About text formats

Copy of Compare Soft Saturation vs. Regular Inductor - Switching - on Fri, 01/19/2024 - 20:14

User-1705714372
Designer253319

User-1705714372

Member for

2 months 4 weeks

1

designs

1

groups

Welcome to the community!!

Description

This design shows the importance of choosing the right inductor size and type, to avoid saturation-induced current spikes during operating transients. In this case, the start-up transient in two nearly identical open-loop buck power stages (12V -&gt; 3V) is examined. The only difference is that the top circuit is using an inductor calibrated to a Coilcraft XAL6060-223 (22uH), which has "soft saturation" behavior. The bottom circuit is using a similarly sized inductor, but with a more typical "hard saturation" characteristic.

Both inductors work well for the steady-state load condition of 3 Amp. But during the turn-on transient, that current can go significantly above that nominal level. At that time, the instantaneous inductance of the hard-saturating device collapses, resulting in even larger current spikes in each switching interval. Note in the waveforms on the left: The soft-saturation inductance drops to 14uH minimum during the transient, whereas the hard-saturation inductance crashes to near 2uH, or only 10% of its nominal value!

About text formats

Copy of Compare Soft Saturation vs. Regular Inductor - Switching - on Mon, 01/27/2020 - 10:09

tichboby
Designer229238

tichboby

Member for

4 years 2 months

1

designs

1

groups

Add a bio to your profile to share information about yourself with other SystemVision users.

Description

This design shows the importance of choosing the right inductor size and type, to avoid saturation-induced current spikes during operating transients. In this case, the start-up transient in two nearly identical open-loop buck power stages (12V -&gt; 3V) is examined. The only difference is that the top circuit is using an inductor calibrated to a Coilcraft XAL6060-223 (22uH), which has "soft saturation" behavior. The bottom circuit is using a similarly sized inductor, but with a more typical "hard saturation" characteristic.Both inductors work well for the steady-state load condition of 3 Amp. But during the turn-on transient, that current can go significantly above that nominal level. At that time, the instantaneous inductance of the hard-saturating device collapses, resulting in even larger current spikes in each switching interval. Note in the waveforms on the left: The soft-saturation inductance drops to 14uH minimum during the transient, whereas the hard-saturation inductance crashes to near 2uH, or only 10% of its nominal value!

About text formats

Compare Soft Saturation vs. Regular Inductor - Switching

Ellis
Designer217944

Ellis

Member for

4 years 10 months

3

designs

1

groups

Add a bio to your profile to share information about yourself with other SystemVision users.

Description

This design shows the importance of choosing the right inductor size and type, to avoid saturation-induced current spikes during operating transients. In this case, the start-up transient in two nearly identical open-loop buck power stages (12V -&gt; 3V) is examined. The only difference is that the top circuit is using an inductor calibrated to a Coilcraft XAL6060-223 (22uH), which has "soft saturation" behavior. The bottom circuit is using a similarly sized inductor, but with a more typical "hard saturation" characteristic. Both inductors work well for the steady-state load condition of 3 Amp. But during the turn-on transient, that current can go significantly above that nominal level. At that time, the instantaneous inductance of the hard-saturating device collapses, resulting in even larger current spikes in each switching interval. Note in the waveforms on the left: The soft-saturation inductance drops to 14uH minimum during the transient, whereas the hard-saturation inductance crashes to near 2uH, or only 10% of its nominal value!

About text formats

Compare Soft Saturation vs. Regular Inductor - Switching

cellis94
Designer215607

cellis94

Member for

5 years

1

designs

1

groups

Add a bio to your profile to share information about yourself with other SystemVision users.

Description

This design shows the importance of choosing the right inductor size and type, to avoid saturation-induced current spikes during operating transients. In this case, the start-up transient in two nearly identical open-loop buck power stages (12V -&gt; 3V) is examined. The only difference is that the top circuit is using an inductor calibrated to a Coilcraft XAL6060-223 (22uH), which has "soft saturation" behavior. The bottom circuit is using a similarly sized inductor, but with a more typical "hard saturation" characteristic. Both inductors work well for the steady-state load condition of 3 Amp. But during the turn-on transient, that current can go significantly above that nominal level. At that time, the instantaneous inductance of the hard-saturating device collapses, resulting in even larger current spikes in each switching interval. Note in the waveforms on the left: The soft-saturation inductance drops to 14uH minimum during the transient, whereas the hard-saturation inductance crashes to near 2uH, or only 10% of its nominal value!

About text formats

DJD Copy -Compare Soft Saturation vs. Regular Inductor - Switching

Daniel Deitschel
Designer257

Daniel Deitschel

Member for

8 years 10 months

43

designs

1

groups

Add a bio to your profile to share information about yourself with other SystemVision users.

Description

This design shows the importance of choosing the right inductor size and type, to avoid saturation-induced current spikes during operating transients. In this case, the start-up transient in two nearly identical open-loop buck power stages (12V -&gt; 3V) is examined. The only difference is that the top circuit is using an inductor calibrated to a Coilcraft XAL6060-223 (22uH), which has "soft saturation" behavior. The bottom circuit is using a similarly sized inductor, but with a more typical "hard saturation" characteristic. Both inductors work well for the steady-state load condition of 3 Amp. But during the turn-on transient, that current can go significantly above that nominal level. At that time, the instantaneous inductance of the hard-saturating device collapses, resulting in even larger current spikes in each switching interval. Note in the waveforms on the left: The soft-saturation inductance drops to 14uH minimum during the transient, whereas the hard-saturation inductance crashes to near 2uH, or only 10% of its nominal value!

About text formats

Compare Soft Saturation vs. Regular Inductor - Switching

Haroldo Amaral
Designer40296

Haroldo Amaral

Member for

8 years

52

designs

1

groups

Add a bio to your profile to share information about yourself with other SystemVision users.

Description

This design shows the importance of choosing the right inductor size and type, to avoid saturation-induced current spikes during operating transients. In this case, the start-up transient in two nearly identical open-loop buck power stages (12V -&gt; 3V) is examined. The only difference is that the top circuit is using an inductor calibrated to a Coilcraft XAL6060-223 (22uH), which has "soft saturation" behavior. The bottom circuit is using a similarly sized inductor, but with a more typical "hard saturation" characteristic. Both inductors work well for the steady-state load condition of 3 Amp. But during the turn-on transient, that current can go significantly above that nominal level. At that time, the instantaneous inductance of the hard-saturating device collapses, resulting in even larger current spikes in each switching interval. Note in the waveforms on the left: The soft-saturation inductance drops to 14uH minimum during the transient, whereas the hard-saturation inductance crashes to near 2uH, or only 10% of its nominal value!

About text formats

Compare Soft Saturation vs. Regular Inductor - Switching

KTakane
Designer206124

KTakane

Member for

5 years 5 months

6

designs

1

groups

Add a bio to your profile to share information about yourself with other SystemVision users.

Description

This design shows the importance of choosing the right inductor size and type, to avoid saturation-induced current spikes during operating transients. In this case, the start-up transient in two nearly identical open-loop buck power stages (12V -&gt; 3V) is examined. The only difference is that the top circuit is using an inductor calibrated to a Coilcraft XAL6060-223 (22uH), which has "soft saturation" behavior. The bottom circuit is using a similarly sized inductor, but with a more typical "hard saturation" characteristic. Both inductors work well for the steady-state load condition of 3 Amp. But during the turn-on transient, that current can go significantly above that nominal level. At that time, the instantaneous inductance of the hard-saturating device collapses, resulting in even larger current spikes in each switching interval. Note in the waveforms on the left: The soft-saturation inductance drops to 14uH minimum during the transient, whereas the hard-saturation inductance crashes to near 2uH, or only 10% of its nominal value!

About text formats

Terms of Use Cookie Notice Data Privacy Notice

Mike DonnellyDesigner19

Member for

Designer0

Member for

Designer0

Member for

User-1705714372Designer253319

Member for

tichbobyDesigner229238

Member for

EllisDesigner217944

Member for

cellis94Designer215607

Member for

Daniel DeitschelDesigner257

Member for

Haroldo AmaralDesigner40296

Member for

KTakaneDesigner206124

Member for

Mike Donnelly
Designer19

User-1705714372
Designer253319

tichboby
Designer229238

Ellis
Designer217944

cellis94
Designer215607

Daniel Deitschel
Designer257

Haroldo Amaral
Designer40296

KTakane
Designer206124