transformer | PartQuest™ Explore

Application Area

Member of the PartQuest Explore Development Team. Focused on modeling and simulation of analog, mixed-signal and multi-discipline systems covering a broad range of applications, including power electronics, controls and mechatronic systems.

Zoom test

DGB
Designer12

DGB

Member for

11 years 1 month

116

designs

10

groups

Add a bio to your profile to share information about yourself with other SystemVision users.

Description

This transformer design example demonstrates a current in-rush or "peaking" effect that depends on the phase or timing of the AC supply switch closure. A rather counter-intuitive result is shown;Case 1: Set the initial_delay of the digital pulse to 4.17m seconds, which causes the switch to closed when the sinusoidal AC line input voltage is at its peak, one quarter-cycle at its 60 Hz frequency. The current into the primary winding will immediately follow its nominal steady-state no-load profile, with a peak of just under 100mA. Case 2: Set the digital pulse initial_delay to 0 seconds, so that the line voltage is applied to the transformer immediately at its rising zero-crossing. This results in a large non-sinusoidal peaking current which exceeds 500mA on its initial cycle!This is a direct result of saturation in the magnetic core. To produce the necessary "volt-seconds" in Case 2, the magnetic flux in the core must be twice that of Case 1. But if the transformer is sized such that its peak flux density is somewhat close to the the saturation level for nominal steady-state operation, then a start-up transient with the unfortunate timing of Case 2 will result in a large in-rush current.Note that the flux density "b" is displayed for the magnetic core. The core saturation flux density is specified as 1.5 Tesla, a typical value for Electrical Steel. You can also select "B vs. H from Table" to see the performance for a specific type of NGO Electrical Steel -35PN250 from the manufacturer Posco.

About text formats

Transformer Magnetizing In-rush Current

Mike Donnelly
Designer19

Mike Donnelly

Member for

11 years 1 month

1,706

designs

10

groups

Member of the PartQuest Explore Development Team. Focused on modeling and simulation of analog, mixed-signal and multi-discipline systems covering a broad range of applications, including power electronics, controls and mechatronic systems.

Description

This transformer design example demonstrates a current in-rush or "peaking" effect that depends on the phase or timing of the AC supply switch closure. A rather counter-intuitive result is shown;Case 1: Set the initial_delay of the digital pulse to 4.17m seconds, which causes the switch to closed when the sinusoidal AC line input voltage is at its peak, one quarter-cycle at its 60 Hz frequency. The current into the primary winding will immediately follow its nominal steady-state no-load profile, with a peak of just under 100mA. Case 2: Set the digital pulse initial_delay to 0 seconds, so that the line voltage is applied to the transformer immediately at its rising zero-crossing. This results in a large non-sinusoidal peaking current which exceeds 500mA on its initial cycle!This is a direct result of saturation in the magnetic core. To produce the necessary "volt-seconds" in Case 2, the magnetic flux in the core must be twice that of Case 1. But if the transformer is sized such that its peak flux density is somewhat close to the the saturation level for nominal steady-state operation, then a start-up transient with the unfortunate timing of Case 2 will result in a large in-rush current.Note that the flux density "b" is displayed for the magnetic core. The core saturation flux density is specified as 1.5 Tesla, a typical value for Electrical Steel. You can also select "B vs. H from Table" to see the performance for a specific type of NGO Electrical Steel -35PN250 from the manufacturer Posco.

About text formats