TDFS Loop Stability for Buck DC to DC Converter - Switching Designer https://explore.partquest.com/node/13736 <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/13736"></iframe> Title Description <p>This design demonstrates the use of the TDFS (Time Domain Frequency Sweep) simulation method, to measure the open-loop frequency response of an operating closed-loop system containing switching elements.</p><p>The stability of the "Buck DC to DC Converter - Switching" design is assessed. This is a switching circuit, it does not use a state-average model for the modulator, so the standard AC Analysis method cannot be used. Rather, the frequency response is generated from time-domain simulation results. The TDFS approach can also be used for systems that contain sampling or digital control aspects.</p><p>This particular example is directly comparable to the design titled "TDFS Loop Stability for Buck DC to DC Converter - State Average". In that design, both the TDFS and AC Analysis methods are used to measure the open loop transfer function of an equivalent non-switching circuit.</p><p>Note that the approach used to characterize the loop stability, by injecting a small sinusoidal stimulus signal in series with the loop and then measuring the complex ratio of the ground referenced return signal to the injected signal, is described in:</p><p>D. Venable, “Testing Power Sources for Stability”, Venable technical paper #1, Venable Industries</p> About text formats Tags Buck Convertercomponent stressOp-Amp Lead-Lag CompensatorSwitching ConverterMCH6337 P-Channel MOSFETNCV20071 Op-AmpNRVBA130LT3G Schottky Power RectifierMSS1583-105KE_ Power InductorPEG127KA3110Q Electrolytic CapacitorTDFS Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None -
Battery charging circuit part 3 Designer https://explore.partquest.com/node/7046 <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/7046"></iframe> Title Description <p>Battery charging circuit for lithium ion battery. This is derived from a www.Silego.com GreenPak 2 application note. </p><p>Includes model of lithium ion battery.</p> About text formats Tags Batterycharging circuitBuck Converterlithium ionGreenPak 2Silego Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None -
Battery charging circuit part 2 Designer https://explore.partquest.com/node/6036 <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/6036"></iframe> Title Description <p>Battery charging circuit for lithium ion battery. This is derived from a www.Silego.com GreenPak 2 application note. </p> About text formats Tags Batterycharging circuitBuck Converterlithium ionGreenPak 2 Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None -
Battery charging circuit part 1 Designer https://explore.partquest.com/node/5776 <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/5776"></iframe> Title Description <p>Battery charging circuit for lithium ion battery. This is derived from a www.Silego.com GreenPak 2 application note. </p> About text formats Tags Batterycharging circuitBuck Converterlithium ionGreenPak 2 Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None -
Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator Designer https://explore.partquest.com/node/1331 <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/1331"></iframe> Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design. In this case, a comparison is made between a buck converter and a linear voltage regulator. A model was calibrated to represent an MC7805B, a 5V and 1A Linear Regulator, using only information supplied in the datasheet. </p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. The efficiency and performance of both voltage conversion methods can be analyzed and compared. Performance metrics include line and load transient response, as well as both time-domain and frequency-domain ripple rejection simulations. The results provide the information needed to make key design trade-offs.</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterLinear RegulatorState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisRipple rejectionDesign Trade-offsMC7805B Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None -
Automotive Buck Converter with NCV8851 - AC Analysis Designer https://explore.partquest.com/node/676 <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/676"></iframe> Title Description <p>This simulation uses an AC small-signal model of an NCV8851 Automotive Grade Synchronous Buck Controller, to identify the open loop transfer function and analyze the loop stability of a reference buck converter design.</p> About text formats Tags NCV8851Buck ConverterLoop Stability Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None -
TDFS Loop Stability for Buck DC to DC Converter - State Average Designer https://explore.partquest.com/node/593 <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/593"></iframe> Title Description <p>This design uses both TDFS and standard AC Analysis methods to assess the stability of a closed-loop system. The design is the "Buck DC to DC Converter", using a state-average model for the modulator function. </p><p>The use of state-average models supports AC Analysis, but TDFS (Time Domain Frequency Sweep) is also used to show the equivalency of the methods. Note that the TDFS approach can be used for systems that do not support AC Analysis, such as switching circuits or systems that contain sampling or digital control aspects. This particular example is directly comparable to the design "TDFS Loop Stability for Buck DC to DC Converter - Switching". In that design, the TDFS method is used to measure the open loop transfer function of an operational switching circuit.</p><p>Note that the approach used to characterize the loop stability, by injecting a small sinusoidal stimulus signal in series with the loop and then measuring the complex ratio of the ground referenced return signal to the injected signal, is described in:</p><p>D. Venable, “Testing Power Sources for Stability”, Venable technical paper #1, Venable Industries</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterState-AverageAC AnalysisTDFSLoop StabilityVenable Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None -
Buck DC to DC Converter - Switching Designer https://explore.partquest.com/node/518 <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/518"></iframe> Title Description <p>This design is a detailed circuit implementation of the more abstract "state-average" buck converter model shown in the companion design example: “Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator”. This example includes the low-pass voltage sense circuit, an op-amp implementation of the difference amplifier and the lead-lag compensators, as well as PWM switching control of a power MOSFET. Simulation results for the line and load transients, ripple rejection and the power consumption are very similar to the results from the abstract model.</p><p>This design uses a number of "datasheet characterized" components, including the power MOSFET (MCH6337), freewheel diode (NRVBA130LT3G) and op-amps (NCV20071), as well as the passive inductor (MSS1583-105KE_) and capacitor (PEG127KA3110Q) of the power stage . The parameter values of these devices were entered directly from the datasheet for the corresponding part, including the "Maximum Ratings" information.</p><p>While the simulation time for this switching circuit is significantly longer than for the abstract model, more detailed information about the circuit’s signals and components is available. This includes the component stress levels, which are monitored within all the "datasheet" models. For example, the stress indicator for the power inductor shows that the maximum RMS current level is exceeded under this simulated operating condition (i.e. stress_ratio_current_rms > 1.0).</p><p>The companion design, "TDFS Loop Stability for Buck DC to DC Converter - Switching", demonstrates a method to directly assess the open-loop frequency response, and hence the stability margin, of this converter. The TDFS (Time Domain Frequency Sweep) method circumvents the need for state-average models of the switching elements.</p> About text formats Tags Buck Convertercomponent stressOp-Amp Lead-Lag CompensatorSwitching ConverterNCV20071 Op-AmpNRVBA130LT3G Schottky Power RectifierMSS1583-105KE_ Power InductorPEG127KA3110Q Electrolytic Capacitor Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None -
Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator Designer https://explore.partquest.com/node/451 <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/451"></iframe> Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design. In this case, a comparison is made between a buck converter and a linear voltage regulator. A model was calibrated to represent an MC7805B, a 5V and 1A Linear Regulator, using only information supplied in the datasheet. </p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. The efficiency and performance of both voltage conversion methods can be analyzed and compared. Performance metrics include line and load transient response, as well as both time-domain and frequency-domain ripple rejection simulations. The results provide the information needed to make key design trade-offs.</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterLinear RegulatorState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisRipple rejectionDesign Trade-offsMC7805B Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None -